The SEC intends to focus on defending the rule's merits in court
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced a significant development regarding its new climate disclosure rule. In a move that balances regulatory caution with legal strategy, the SEC has decided to pause the implementation of this rule while it addresses ongoing legal challenges.
In March, the SEC finalized a rule requiring public companies to disclose their climate risks to investors and report emissions figures. This rule, which has been in development since 2022, aims to provide investors with more transparent information about companies' environmental impacts and risks.
Since its proposal, the rule has faced criticism from various quarters. Initially, it included requirements for some companies to report on emissions from their supply chains and from consumers using their products (known as Scope 3 emissions). In response to pushback, the SEC scaled back these requirements in the final version of the rule.
Despite these modifications, the rule still faces legal opposition. In March, several states and business groups filed lawsuits against the SEC, arguing that the rule remains flawed. Conversely, some environmental advocates have sued, claiming the rule doesn't go far enough.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the entities suing over the rule, has accused the SEC of attempting to micromanage companies. Tom Quaadman, executive vice president of the chamber's capital-markets group, stated that the changes "will only create more confusion and undermine investor confidence in our public company system."
In response to these legal challenges, the SEC has made a strategic decision to pause the rule's implementation. This decision comes after an appeals court ordered a temporary stay blocking the rule's enforcement last month. Rather than fight this temporary stay, the SEC has chosen to accept a pause while it defends the rule's merits in court.
The agency explained its decision in a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, stating that the pause is partly to avoid regulatory uncertainty as litigation proceeds. The SEC maintains that the rule is lawful and within its authority to order, but it wants to focus on defending the rule's merits against legal challenges.
"A Commission stay will facilitate the orderly judicial resolution of those challenges and allow the court of appeals to focus on deciding the merits," the SEC stated in its filing.
While the reporting requirements under this rule weren't set to take effect until 2026, many businesses have already been preparing to comply, despite the ongoing legal disputes. It's worth noting that other jurisdictions, including California, have implemented their own requirements for climate-related reporting from both publicly traded and privately held companies.
The SEC has emphasized that it intends to "vigorously defend" the rule, signaling its commitment to the principles behind the climate disclosure requirements. However, the pause in implementation provides a period of regulatory stability for affected companies while the legal challenges are addressed.
This development underscores the complex interplay between regulatory initiatives, business interests, and environmental concerns. As the legal process unfolds, stakeholders across the business and environmental spectrum will be watching closely to see how this impacts the future of corporate climate disclosures in the United States.
We will continue to monitor this situation and provide updates as new information becomes available.
Comments